THE DIFFERENT HEALING TIME OF CIRCUMCISION WITH ELECTRIC CAUTTER AND CONVENTIONAL METHOD HELD IN GENTENG – BANYUWANGI.

Abstract

Process of sircumsisi will affect at hurt appearance at penis. Meanwhile method of sircumsisi or of khitan which is often conducted among others is convensional method and cauter electric.This research is aimed to know difference of long healing of hurf of sircumsisi convensional method and method of electric cauter. Design is used this research use compares design. Population in this reseach is all child which is sircumsisi with convensional method and cauter electric which enter criterion of inclusion with amount of sample 20 responder. Techniques of sampling utilize Quota sampling. Appliance for the process of data collecting is observation sheet, is hereinafter analyzed with statistical test of Franc of Willcoxon with α = 0.05. result of research known that long healing of hurt at responder of sircumsisi with convensional method, at phase of homeostasis some of responder (50%), healing of its tady hurt. At inflammation phase, most responder healing of its tardy hurt (60%) and at phase phase of proliferation most responder healing of its tardy hurt (60%). Meanwhile for the healing of hurt of sircumsisi at method of electric entirety cauter (100%) in category quickly. From statistical analysis got that value ρ = 0.046 < α =0.05 with the meaning there is difference of long healing of hurt of sircumsisi conventional method and cauter electric in Region District Of getting Sub-Province of Banyuwangi Year 2015. Result of research indicate circumcision method recover quickly. Suggestion to give all old fellow and offcer of health, when doing sircumsisi to chosen method of electric cauter.