Analysis Of Rat Demand With Fleas Index In Class Work Area I Tanjung Perak Surabaya Port

Authors

  • Sa’diyah Nur Qosamah
  • Agus Aan Adriansyah
  • Dwi Handayani

Keywords:

density of mice, index fleas, harbor, xenopsylla chepis

Abstract

The distribution of bubonic plague in Indonesia is inseparable from the role of the port as an entrance for passenger and goods transportation. PES is a zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Yersinia Pesti which infects rodents such as mice and can spread to humans through the fleas bite of Xenopsylla cheopis. This study aims to analyze the density of rats and index fleas in the working area of Class 1 KKP Tanjung Perak Surabaya. This type of research is analytical descriptive with aapproach cross sectional. Research variables are rat density and fleas index. The study population was a total trap installed by the CTF of 150 traps. The research sample was 110 traps using themethod cluster random sampling. Data analysis usedtest chi-square. The results showed that success rat trappings of 15.45% belonged to the high density category (> 7%) andfleas index results Xenopsylla cheopis of 2.64% were included in the high fleas index category (> 1%). The density of mice is related to the index of fleas with a value of ρ = 0,000 <0,05. Theconclusion of the study is that there is a relationship of density of mice with index fleas in the working area of Class 1 KKP Tanjung Perak Surabaya. Suggestions for institutions are to improve environmental sanitation by maintaining the cleanliness of the warehouse, making efforts to improve the building.

References

Annashr, N.N, Santoso, L & Hestiningsih, R, 2011. Studi Kepadatan Tikus dan Ekstoparasit di

Desa Jomblang, Kecamatan Candisari, Kota Semarang. Wawasan Kesehatan, Volume 3(2), pp. 68-76

Depkes RI, 2008. Pedoman Pengendalian Tikus Khusus di Rumah Sakit, Jakarta: Departemen

Kesehatan Ditjen PP & PL. [3] Joharina, A.S, Mulyono, A & Sari, T.F, 2016. Rikettsia pada Pinjal Tikus (Xenopsylla Cheopis) di

Daerah Pelabuhan Semarang, Kupang, dan Maumere. Buletin Penelitian Kesehatan, Volume 44(4), pp. 237-244. [4] Kemenkes RI, 2007. Keputusan Menteri No. 431/MENKES/SK/VI/2007 Pedoman Teknis

Pengendalian Resiko Kesehatan Lingkungan di Pelabuhan/Bandara/Pos Lintas Batas dalam Rangka

Karantina Kesehatan, Jakarta: Menteri Kesehatan RI. [5] Kemenkes RI, 2010. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2010, Jakarta: Kementerian Kesehatan. [6] Kemenkes RI, 2013. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia No.34 Tahun 2013 tentang

Penyelenggaraan Tindakan Hapus Tikus dan Hapus Serangga Pada Alat Angkut di Pelabuhan, Bandar Udara, dan Pos Lintas Batas Darat, Jakarta: Menteri Kesehatan. [7] Mutaqin, A.K.A, Ngadino & Thohari, I, 2016. Kebehasilan Penangkapan Tikus (trap suces) dan

Indeks Pinjal di Desa Kayubakek Kabupaten Pasuruan Tahun 2016. Jurnal Gema Kesehatan

Lingkungan, Volume 14(2), pp. 94-99. [8] Priyotomo, Y. C., 2014. Studi Kepadatan Tikus dan Ektoparasit di Daerah Perimeter dan Buffer

Pelabuhan Laut Cilacap. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, Volume 3(2), pp. 86-95. [9] Ristiyanto, 2007. Modul Pelatihan Teknis Tingkat Dasar Survei Reservoir Penyakit Bidang Minat

Rodensia. Salatiga: B2P2VRP. [10] Ristiyanto, Handayani, F.D, Boewono, D.T & Heriyanto, B, 2014. Penyakit Tular Rodensia. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press. [11] Rusmini, 2011. Bahaya Leptospirosis (Penyakit Kencing Tikus) & Cara Pencegahannya. Yogyakarta: Gosyen Publishing. [12] Sulasmi & Sri Hasuti, 2017. Observasi Tingkat Kepadatan Tikus di Lingkungan Buffer dan

Perimeter Pelabuhan Soekarno Hatta Makassar. Sulolipu : Media Komunikasi Sivitas Akademika dan

Masyarakat, Volume 17(1), pp. 15-20. [13] Widjaja, S., Williams, M., Winoto, I & Farzeli, A, 2016. Geographical assessment of

rickettsiosioses in Indonesia. Vector Borne Zoonotic,

Downloads

Published

2020-06-29

How to Cite

Nur Qosamah, S., Aan Adriansyah, A., & Handayani, D. (2020). Analysis Of Rat Demand With Fleas Index In Class Work Area I Tanjung Perak Surabaya Port. PROCEEDING SURABAYA INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CONFERENCE 2019, 1(1), 304–310. Retrieved from https://conferences.unusa.ac.id/index.php/SIHC19/article/view/541